• LOGIN
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • FREE E-Newsletter/Product Bulletins

Annals of Long Term Care

  • Follow us on

Search

  • Home
  • ARCHIVES
    • Issues
    • Supplements/Webcasts
  • About Us
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Description
    • Editorial Board
    • Publishing Staff
    • Our Partners
    • AGS Affiliations
    • Reprints/Permissions
  • SUBMIT
    • Author Guidelines
    • Copyright Transfer Form
    • Author Disclosure Form
    • Submit Now
  • CONTACT
  • ADVERTISING
    • Print Rate Card
    • Online Rate Card
    • Classified Rate Card
    • Sales Contacts
  • Supplements/Special Projects
  • Journal News
  • WEBCASTS
    • Facing Postherpetic Neuralgia in LTC
    • Treatment for Postherpetic Neuralgia Pain
    • Case Study—LTC Patient Suffering from PHN

Q & A With the Expert on: Atrial Fibrillation

  • Thu, 7/9/09 - 3:48pm
  • 0 Comments
  • 1886 reads
Citation: 

Pages 36 - 37

Author(s): 

Wilbert S. Aronow, MD, FACC, FAHA, AGSF

Q: Should a 78-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation with hypertension, diabetes, prior heart failure, and prior stroke without contraindications to warfarin be treated with warfarin or aspirin? If warfarin, to what international normalized ratio?

Case Presentation

A 78-year-old functionally independent woman has had hypertension and diabetes mellitus for the past 1 year. Six months ago, she developed congestive heart failure (CHF) precipitated by an episode of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), with an average ventricular rate of 165 beats per minute, which resolved after direct-current cardioversion of the AF to sinus rhythm. A 2-dimensional echocardiogram at that time revealed a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 35%. Three months ago, she developed a thromboembolic stroke with left hemiparesis, which resolved in 1 week. An electrocardiogram at that time revealed AF, which has persisted. Her current medications include glyburide 5 mg daily, hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg daily, ramipril 10 mg twice daily, simvastatin 40 mg daily, aspirin 325 mg daily, and digoxin 0.25 mg daily.

Physical examination in her physician’s office revealed a blood pressure in the sitting and standing positions in the right brachial artery of 136/80 mm Hg and of 134/82 mm Hg in the left brachial artery, a grossly irregular pulse with a rate of 106 per minute, and a respiratory rate of 16 per minute. Physical examination was normal except for a grossly irregular cardiac rhythm with an average ventricular rate of 114 per minute.

The patient’s fasting blood sugar was 98 mg/dL, hemoglobin A1c was 6.8%, serum total cholesterol was 143 mg/dL, serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 69 mg/dL, serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 50 mg/dL, and her serum triglycerides were 120 mg/dL. Her hemoglobin, hematocrit, and thyroid function tests were normal.

How should this patient have her AF managed?

A:This patient needs the addition of a beta blocker such as metoprolol or carvedilol to slow her rapid ventricular rate associated with AF.1 Oral verapamil and diltiazem also could slow her rapid ventricular rate but are contraindicated because of her abnormal LVEF. The addition of a beta blocker to her angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril will also increase her LVEF. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure and the American Diabetes Association recommend reducing the blood pressure to less than 130/80 mm Hg in patients with diabetes mellitus. The addition of a beta blocker such as carvedilol to her antihypertensive regimen of hydrochlorothiazide plus ramipril should achieve that goal.
On the basis of data from trials such as the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study,2 the case patient should be treated with ventricular rate control plus warfarin therapy to maintain an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0-3.0, rather than with an attempt to maintain sinus rhythm with antiarrhythmic drugs after cardioversion to sinus rhythm plus the use of warfarin. In this randomized study of 4060 patients (39% women; mean age, 70 yr) as compared with ventricular rate control plus warfarin, the maintenance of sinus rhythm plus warfarin therapy group had an insignificant increase in all-cause mortality at 5-year follow-up from 21% to 24%, an insignificant increase in thromboembolic stroke from 5.5% to 7.1%, a significant increase in hospitalization from 73% to 80%, and no difference in quality of life or functional status.2

The CHADS2 score is a validated predictive instrument used to assess stroke risk in patients with AF in the general population.3 It gives 1 point for age older than 75 years, 1 point for hypertension, 1 point for diabetes mellitus, 1 point for CHF, and 2 points for prior stroke or transient ischemic attack.

References: 

1. Aronow WS. Management of atrial fibrillation in the elderly. Minerva Med 2009; 100:3-24. Published Online: January 30, 2009.

2. Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, et al; Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1825-1833.

3. Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W, et al. Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: Results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA 2001;285: 2864-2870.

4. Secondary prevention in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. EAFT (European Atrial Fibrillation Trial) Study Group. Lancet 1993;342:1255-1262.

5. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Adjusted-dose warfarin versus low-intensity, fixed-dose warfarin plus aspirin for high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation III randomised clinical trial. Lancet 1996;348:633-638.

6. Aronow WS, Ahn C, Kronzon I, Gutstein H. Effect of warfarin versus aspirin on the incidence of new thromboembolic stroke in older persons with chronic atrial fibrillation and abnormal and normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:1033-1035.

image description image description
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »



Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

LATEST NEWS

  • FDA Finally Approves Once-Weekly Type 2 Diabetes Treatment
    [Amylin] 1-31-12
  • FDA approves Voraxaze to treat patients with toxic methotrexate levels
    [FDA] 1-17-12
  • FDA approves first generic version of cholesterol-lowering drug Lipitor
    [FDA] 11-30-11
  • AHRQ Awards $34 Million To Expand Fight Against Healthcare-Associated Infections
    [AHRQ] 11-17-11
more »

Poll

Are nutritional supplements underutilized in long-term care?:

Classified/Recruitment Opportunities

  • Advertise Your Job Here
more »

ALTC Blogs

Getting the Most Out of Your Continuing Medical Education Classes

Neil Baum MD
2/8/12 | 0 Comments | 7 reads

February is American Heart Month

Alvin B Lin MD FAAFP
2/7/12 | 0 Comments | 26 reads

How to Create Collegiality in a Difference of Opinion: Part 2

Neil Baum MD
2/6/12 | 0 Comments | 35 reads
more »
banner banner banner banner banner
HMP Communications © 2012 HMP Communications
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Other Publications
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

HMP Communications LLC (HMP) is the authoritative source for comprehensive information and education servicing healthcare professionals. HMP’s products include peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed medical journals, national tradeshows and conferences, online programs and customized clinical programs. HMP is a wholly owned subsidiary of HMP Communications Holdings LLC. © 2012 HMP Communications