Is the Use of Supplemental Vitamin C and Zinc for the Prevention & Treatment of Pressure Ulcers Evidence-Based?
Pages 28 - 32
Supplemental zinc and vitamin C are routinely prescribed for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. The authors sought to determine whether there is sufficient evidence-based medical research to support the use of these supplements. Both zinc and vitamin C have been shown in animals to be necessary for effective wound healing. Since malnutrition in institutionalized older patients may contribute to their risk of developing pressure ulcers and may interfere with the treatment of these lesions, it has been proposed that improving nutrition through supplementation of vitamin C and zinc may assist in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. However, the authors’ review of the literature found that there is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of supplemental zinc and/or vitamin C in individuals with adequate nutrition. Furthermore, supplemental zinc may produce a number of adverse effects. (Annals of Long-Term Care: Clinical Care and Aging 2010;18:28-32)
There are several types of skin ulcers that affect older patients: venous or stasis ulcers, arterial insufficiency ulcers, diabetic neuropathic ulcers, and pressure ulcers. In this article, we will focus on whether zinc and vitamin supplementation assist in wound healing, with the focus on pressure ulcers, also referred to as decubitus ulcers, pressure sores, and bedsores.
Before discussing the incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers, it is important to point out that there are few good nationwide studies. Pressure ulcers are estimated to affect 1.3-3 million people in the United States.1 Older people account for 70% of all pressure ulcers. 2 The highest incidence of pressure ulcers has been reported in hospitalized vulnerable elderly persons undergoing orthopedic procedures (9-19%) and quadriplegics (33-60%).3-5 In response to a challenge from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), a survey was conducted from 1989 to 2005. The survey included 148 U.S. health facilities. The range of pressure ulcer prevalence prior to 1999 was from 9.2% to 11.1%. Over the next six-year period, from 1999-2005 the prevalence of pressure ulcers remained at 15%.6 Similarly, the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) has reported prevalence rates ranging from 8-23%.7,8 Studies conducted in the Netherlands have shown the prevalence of pressure ulcers to range from 12.8-20.3% in one study and 23.1% in another.9,10
The incidence of these lesions in intensive care units (ICUs) is reported to range from 14% in short-stay units to as high as 41% in long-stay units.11 In a cross-sectional point study done in Dutch ICUs, the national prevalence rate was as high as 28.7%.12 A survey of four European countries has reported a prevalence of 4% in Denmark and as high as 49% in Germany.13,14 In East Carolina, the prevalence rate prior to implementation of a prevention program in two ICUs was 11.7%.15 Another study done in an ICU in a midwestern U.S. hospital showed that 20% of the patients developed pressure ulcers during their ICU stay.16
Prevalence of pressure ulcers is also higher in the elderly, in those who are acutely ill, and in persons with spinal cord injury.1 In a review done over a six-year period in participating acute care healthcare organizations in the United States, prevalence rates ranged from 14-17%.6,17 Over a 10-year period from 1990 to 2000, the NPUAP reported that the prevalence in acute care settings ranged from 10-18%, 2.3-28% in long-term care (LTC), and 0-29% in home care.18,19 Another study found a prevalence of 11.4% in 10,000 nursing home (NH) residents.20 In 2004, the Center for Medicaid and State Operations reported a prevalence of 9.1% in NHs.20,21 Variations in sample characteristics and study methodologies, and difference in the range of prevalence, make it necessary to interpret these results with caution.
Pressure ulcers are seen by healthcare professionals as a quality indicator. The first regulation to be revised by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) was on pressure ulcers. This is based on the belief that the current rate of pressure ulcers in LTC facilities can be significantly reduced with appropriate intervention. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed by LTC facilities includes a skin assessment. This information is then released by CMS as a quality-of-care indicator of NH care. LTC facilities must comply with the federal guidelines for the management of pressure ulcers based on the revised Federal Tag 314.22 Noncompliance can lead to financial penalties or risk of loss of federal reimbursement that could lead to the closure of the facility.
In August 2007, CMS published the FY 2008 Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Final Rule. This rule raised the bar for management of pressure ulcers in the acute care setting as well. The Final Rule introduced three different categories of conditions that, when present, trigger a diagnosis-related group, with higher payment as either a complicating condition or major complicating condition that could have been prevented through the application of evidence-based medicine. According to the Final Rule, if these selected conditions were not present on admission, the hospitals will not receive additional payments. Pressure ulcer is a major complicating condition and has had payment implications since October 1, 2008.
Evidence from Animal Studies
Most healthcare professionals believe that vitamins, minerals, and trace elements are required for effective wound healing. Both vitamin C and zinc are needed for formation of mature collagen.23 Their role in wound healing has been clinically applied to pressure ulcers without much scientific evidence. In fact, most of the studies on the role of vitamins and trace metals in wound healing were done in animal models, in patients with hereditary deficiencies, or in those with documented acquired deficiencies. In these studies, it is clear that deficiency in vitamins A, C, zinc, and copper impairs wound healing. However, supplementation of these vitamins and minerals in the diet has not been shown to significantly improve the healing process.23-32 A study done in rats with zinc deficiency showed delayed healing of excised and thermal wounds, but excess zinc in the diet did not enhance wound healing.33 Another study done in mice confirmed the delayed wound healing in zinc-deficient mice and, in addition, showed that excess zinc supplementation delayed wound healing.25 The impaired wound healing that occurs in experimental scurvy is cured with vitamin C supplementation.3 Some animal studies have shown improvement in wound healing and skin integrity with vitamin C supplementation, but these improvements have not been consistently statistically significant.23,34 Overall, most animal studies have failed to show significant improvement in wound healing with supplementation.
Malnutrition and Pressure Ulcers
The impetus for the frequent administration of supplemental zinc and vitamin C may be the frequent occurrence of malnutrition in LTC facilities. Malnutrition appears to be a risk factor for pressure ulcers.35,36 Malnourished patients have approximately two times greater risk of developing pressure ulcers than normally nourished patients.37 Malnutrition may negatively impair the prevention and successful treatment of pressure ulcers.35,36 The incidence of pressure ulcers is increased in patients with decreased protein and energy intake.2,36,38,39 This relationship has also been observed in animal models where severe protein-energy malnutrition increases infection in wounds, decreases collagen deposition, and reduces tensile strength.40 The percentage intake of dietary protein has also been found to predict development of pressure ulcers.35 Evidence shows that improved nutrition and protein supplementation may assist in the prevention and successful treatment of pressure ulcers.2,31,37
Studies have shown the benefit of treatment with high-protein dietary supplements for 15 days and a high-calorie diet in decreasing pressure ulcers.37 However, other studies have failed to confirm a causal relationship between nutrition interventions and the development of pressure ulcers. A review of seven studies of the relationship between malnutrition and pressure ulcers found no association between the two.41 One study did show a positive effect of nutritional supplementation in critically ill inpatients with regard to pressure ulcers. However, the difference in incidence was very small (41% vs 47%).42 Reviewing all the evidence available is beyond the scope of this article; however, based on the current evidence available, a causal relationship between malnutrition and the development and/or failure of the treatment for the pressure ulcers remains to be established. The recent Cochrane Review on nutritional interventions in pressure ulcers found no evidence that mixed nutritional supplements reduce the chance of pressure ulcer development in a critically ill elderly patient. Overall, studies have been inconsistent, of small sample sizes, or using poor-quality methods.43
The use of vitamin supplementation to accelerate wound healing is even more controversial than that of higher protein intake.2 One of the earliest studies of ascorbic acid (AA) for the treatment of pressure ulcers was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 20 patients in a surgical ward who were followed for one month.44 In patients receiving supplementation with AA 500 mg, the healing rate of pressure ulcers was double that of patients receiving placebo. Six of the AA-treated patients had complete healing of their wounds.44 This landmark study probably spurred the increased prescription of vitamin C for wound healing. In 1995, another study was done involving 11 NHs and one hospital, in which 88 patients were randomized.45 The intervention group received AA 500 mg twice daily, with or without ultrasound, for 12 weeks. The control group was given AA 10 mg twice daily (one-third of the recommended dietary allowance [RDA]). The results of this study were inconclusive.38 The main outcomes were surface reduction, healing velocity, and volume reduction of the wounds over 12 weeks. The study could not detect a higher healing rate by any of these measures in the treatment group. These results did not support the use of AA supplementation to accelerate healing of pressure ulcers.37,38
The study of vitamin C and pressure ulcers done by Taylor et al44 in 1974 included only 20 patients. It is not clear whether the patients were truly randomized. Even though they found significant reduction of pressure sore area, the clinical significance of this as opposed to wound healing is unclear. The study done in 1995 by ter Riet45 was mainly based on NH patients. It was also noted that most had nutritional deficiencies on admission. Despite the large sample size, it was still unclear what the role of vitamin C is in pressure ulcer treatment.45
The Cochrane review was able to find only two studies reviewing the role of vitamin C in pressure ulcer treatment, and neither one of them was conclusive.43 The current evidence does not support the routine use of vitamin C supplementation in the absence of scurvy in patients with pressure ulcers.
The data for zinc supplementation in patients with pressure ulcers are very scarce. Currently, there is no evidence to support general use of zinc in patients with normal zinc levels and pressure ulcers. Most studies done on zinc supplementation utilize plasma zinc levels to quantify deficiency. This zinc is bound to plasma protein.27 Plasma zinc levels are homeostatically regulated and are affected by other factors.46 Serum levels do not necessarily correlate with tissue levels.4 Studies have also found it difficult to deplete humans of zinc because of this excellent homeostasis.47
Other methods of measuring zinc include excretion with urine, zinc content in erythrocytes and leukocytes, and free zinc level in cells and serum.46 Unfortunately, one single test cannot accurately determine true zinc level. Currently, a plasma zinc level under 60 µg/dL is considered a deficiency.4 Developing a test to accurately measure zinc status in tissue is a challenge at the present time. For clinical purposes, one would have to show a decreased content of zinc in serum, lymphocytes, and erythrocytes, along with clinical signs and symptoms associated with zinc deficiency. These would further need confirmation with a zinc tolerance test.46 Serum zinc levels also decrease with age, thus a low serum level could be a physiological part of aging.46 All of these factors make the results of studies associating zinc deficiency with pressure ulcers unreliable, since none of the studies were accurately able to determine zinc deficiency in patients with pressure ulcers. It is therefore not surprising that zinc supplementation has not shown clinically significant improvement in pressure ulcer healing.
Norris and Reynolds48 conducted a randomized, double-blind study in 1971 of 14 patients with pressure ulcers. The groups were randomized to receive zinc sulfate 200 mg 3 times a day or placebo for 24 weeks; the groups were switched after 12 weeks.48It was not clear how the patients were allocated. Only 3 of the 14 patients completed the study after 24 weeks, so this trial is limited by the small number of patients. No significant effect of zinc was seen on the pressure ulcers; however, no interpretation of clinical significance can be made because of the small number of patients.48
A randomized controlled study was done in France using a dietary supplement that included zinc.42 The study looked at 672 people over the age of 65 years. The difference in pressure ulcers was statistically significant: 41% versus 47% in the control group. However, the difference was relatively small and could not be attributed to zinc alone. There were also issues regarding the design of the study and data interpretation.
Another small study showed significant reduction in wound area, amount of exudates in infected ulcers, and improvement in wound condition in patients with stage III and IV pressure ulcers receiving supplementation with arginine, vitamin C, and zinc combination.49 The study could not conclude whether the improvement was a direct result of supplementation with zinc or vitamin C individually. Studies show that zinc is necessary for normal protein metabolism and wound healing, but routine supplementation appears to provide no additional benefit in pressure ulcers, and may in fact be harmful.2 Currently, there is no evidence to support the routine use of high doses of zinc supplementation in patients with pressure ulcers.
It is important to examine possible downsides of zinc and vitamin C supplementation. The RDA for vitamin C in adults in the United States is 60 mg per day. This is based on the minimum requirement needed to prevent scurvy.34 The recommendation for the United States is two standard deviations above the average intake needed to provide adequate stores.34 In addition, it appears that elderly persons do not require a higher quantity than their younger counterparts.34 The maximum recommended amount of vitamin C per day is 2000 mg. Many people take higher amounts of vitamin C for viral infections or atherosclerosis. Even though vitamin C is considered nontoxic, higher-than-recommended doses of vitamin C can cause problems.50 Common side effects may include nausea and diarrhea, acidification of the urine, and interference of the antioxidant-prooxidant balance in the body.50 Serious side effects could possibly include oxalic acid stones in patients prone to oxaluria. Uricosuria and uric acid stones can also occur. Patients with a deficiency of the enzyme glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase can go into a hemolytic crisis. Patients with thalassemia or hemochromatosis who are given megadoses of vitamin C will mobilize more iron for chelation, which can result in tissue damage.50
The RDA for zinc is 15 mg of elemental zinc per day.27 Zinc sulfate is available on the market in doses of 110 mg and 220 mg, which contain 25 mg and 50 mg of elemental zinc, respectively. Acute zinc toxicity is rare; however, chronic use can have adverse effects. Routine high-dose zinc supplementation can cause copper deficiency, which can result in anemia and neutropenia.27 Other toxic effects of zinc in large doses include immunosuppression and gastrointestinal distress.27,51 The adverse effects of zinc excess have been studied in 70 institutionalized patients receiving high-dose oral zinc supplementation for the promotion of the healing of pressure ulcers. While zinc showed no beneficial effects on the healing of pressure ulcers, it did produce a 7.8 times greater risk of antibiotic requirement for infections in the group receiving zinc sulfate. Patients receiving zinc supplementation were also 12.5 times more likely to have gastrointestinal side effects.51 These results indicate that in institutionalized older people with pressure ulcers, high doses of routine zinc supplementation can lead to clinically significant adverse effects with little benefit. Therefore, zinc supplementation in patients without a deficiency is not recommended.
Guidelines from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ),52 American Medical Directors Association,5 and the Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine54 all recommend nutritional support for the prevention and healing of pressure ulcers. The AHRQ guidelines recommend that patients with pressure ulcers should first be assessed for nutritional deficiencies. Nutritional support should then be based on these deficiencies and individualized for each patient.52 Therefore, routine vitamin C and zinc supplementation in pressure ulcers is not indicated. A Cochrane review in 2003, updated in 2008, showed conflicting data on vitamin C and zinc supplementation in pressure ulcers.43 So far, no consistent acceleration in wound healing has been reported with vitamin C or zinc supplementation in patients with pressure ulcers.
Most clinical trials of supplements of vitamin C and zinc have either been on small numbers of patients or have been of poor methodology. There are no true randomized controlled trials for either vitamin C or zinc supplementation for pressure ulcers. Inherent problems with evaluation of zinc levels in the tissues have been identified. Based on the literature, there appears to be no effect of these supplements on prevention or treatment of pressure ulcers.40,43
We recommend a thorough nutritional assessment of patients at risk for pressure ulcers and/or who have pressure ulcers. Caloric, protein, vitamin, and/or mineral supplementation should be considered if there is evidence for deficiencies of these nutrients. A simple daily vitamin or two daily supplemental drinks appear to be adequate for elderly persons recovering from acute illnesses.37 While vitamin C and zinc appear to be important for the pathophysiology of wound healing, there is insufficient evidence at this time to support the routine usage of higher than the recommended daily allowance for these supplements for the prevention and/or treatment of pressure sores. Better-designed studies are needed to accurately identify patients with pressure ulcers who will truly benefit from higher doses of vitamin C or zinc supplementation.
Dr. Jamshed’s work is supported by grant # HRSA-07-GACA from the Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The authors report no relevant financial relationships.
Dr. Jamshed is Assistant Professor, Clinical Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; and Dr. Schneider is Professor, Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, and Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
1. Whitney J, Phillips L, Aslam R, et al. Guidelines for the treatment of pressure ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 2006;14:663-679.
2. Donini LM, De Felice MR, Tagliaccica A, et al. Nutritional status and evolution of pressure sores in geriatric patients. J Nutr Health Aging 2005;9:446-454.
3. Bates-Jensen BM, MacLean CH. Quality indicators for the care of pressure ulcers in vulnerable elders. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55(suppl 2):S409-S416.
4. Baumgarten M, Margolis D, Berlin JA, et al. Risk factors for pressure ulcers among elderly hip fracture patients. Wound Repair Regen 2003;11:96-103.
5. Stotts NA, Deosaransingh K, Roll FJ, Newman J. Underutilization of pressure ulcer risk assessment in hip fracture patients. Adv Wound Care 1998;11:32-38.
6. Vangilder C, Macfarlane GD, Meyer. Results of nine international pressure ulcer prevalence surverys: 1989 to 2005. Ostomy Wound Manage 2008;54:40-54.
7. Pressure ulcer treatment guidelines. European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Website. http://www.epuap.org/gltreatment.html. Accessed May 28, 2009.
8. Tannen A, Dassen T, Halfens R. Differences in prevalence of pressure ulcers between the Netherlands and Germany--associations between risk, prevention and occurrence of pressure ulcers in hospitals and nursing homes. J Clin Nurs 2008;17:1237-1244.
9. Schoonhoven L, Bousema MT, Buskens E; prePURSE Study Group. The prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers in hospitalised patients in the Netherlands: A prospective inception cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud 2007;44:927-935. Published Online: April 18, 2006.
10. Bours GJ, Halfens RJ, Abu-Saad HH, Grol RT. Prevalence, prevention, and treatment of pressure ulcers: Descriptive study in 89 institutions in the Netherlands. Res Nurs Health 2002;25:99-110.
11. Keller BP, Wille J, van Ramshorst B, van der Werken C. Pressure ulcers in intensive care patients: A review of risks and prevention. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:1379-1388. Published Online: September 7, 2002.
12. Bours GJ, DeLaat E, Halfens RJ, Lubbers M. Prevalence, risk factors, and prevention of pressure ulcers in Dutch intensive care units. Results of a cross-sectional survey. Intensive Care Med 2001;27:1599-1605.
13. Weststrate J, Heule F. Prevalence of PU, risk factors and use of pressure ulcer-relieving mattresses in ICU patients. Connect Crit Care Nurs 2001;1:77-82.
14. Shahin ES, Dassen T, Halfens RJ. Pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence in intensive care patients: A literature review. Nurs Crit Care2008;13:71-79.
15. Pokorny ME, Koldjeski D, Swanson M. Skin care intervention for patients having cardia surgery. Am J Crit Care 2003;12:535-544.
16. Pender LR, Frazier SK. The relationship between dermal pressure ulcers, oxygenation and perfusion in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2005;21:29-38.
17. Keast DH, Parslow N, Houghton PE, et al. Best practice recommendations for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: Update 2006. Adv Skin Wound Care 2007;20:447-462.
18. Coleman EA, Martau JM, Lin MK, Kramer AM. Pressure ulcer prevalence in long-term nursing home residents since the implementation of OBRA ‘87. Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:728-732.
19. Pressure ulcers in America: Prevalence, incidence, and implications for the future. An executive summary of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel monograph [published correction appears in Adv Skin Wound Care 2002;15(6):E1-E3]. Adv Skin Wound Care 2001;14(4):208-215.
20. Ooi WL, Morris JN, Brandeis GH, et al. Nursing home characteristics and the development of pressure sores and disruptive behaviour. Age Ageing 1999;28:45-52.
21. Guidance on working with quality improvement organizations. Center for Medicaid and State Operations Website. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/SurveyCertificationGenInfo/downloads/SCLetter05-0.... Accessed May 28, 2009.
22. Thomas DR. The new F-tag 314: Prevention and management of pressure ulcers. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2006;7:523-531. Published Online: July 26, 2006.
23. Silverstein RJ, Landsman AS. The effects of a moderate and high dose of vitamin C on wound healing in a controlled guinea pig model. J Foot Ankle Surg 1999;38:333-338.
24. Ehrlich HP, Hunt TK. Effects of cortisone and vitamin A on wound healing. Ann Surg1968;167:324-328.
25. Lim Y, Levy M, Bray TM. Dietary zinc alters early inflammatory responses during cutaneous wound healing in weanling CD-1 mice. J Nutr 2004;134:811-816.
26. Cabbabe EB, Korock SW. Wound healing in vitamin C-deficient and nondeficient guinea pigs: A pilot study. Ann Plast Surg 1986;17:330-334.
27. McClain CJ, McClain M, Barve S, Boosalis MG. Trace metals and the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med 2002;18:801-818, vii-viii.
28. Boyce ST, Supp AP, Swope VB, Warden GD. Vitamin C regulates keratinocyte viability, epidermal barrier, and basement membrane in vitro, and reduces wound contraction after grafting of cultured skin substitutes. J Invest Dermatol 2002;118: 565-572.
29. Gupta A, Singh RL, Raghubir R. Antioxidant status during cutaneous wound healing in immunocompromised rats. Mol Cell Biochem 2002;241:1-7.
30. Thomas DR. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2006;7:46-59.
31. Mathus-Vliegen EM. Old age, malnutrition, and pressure sores: An ill-fated alliance. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2004;59:355-360.
32. Hunt TK, Ehrlich HP, Garcia JA, Dunphy JE. Effect of vitamin A on reversing the inhibitory effect of cortisone on healing of open wounds in animals and man. Ann Surg 1969;170:633-641.
33. Sandstead HH, Lanier VC Jr, Shephard GH, Gillespie DD. Zinc and wound healing. Effects of zinc deficiency and zinc supplementation. Am J Clin Nutr 1970;23:514-519.
34. Hirschmann JV, Raugi GJ. Adult scurvy. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;41:895-910.
35. Bansal C, Scott R, Stewart D, Cockerell CJ. Decubitus ulcers: A review of the literature. Int J Dermatol 2005;44:805-810.
36. Hengstermann S, Fischer A, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Schulz RJ. Nutrition status and pressure ulcer: What we need for nutrition screening. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2007;31:288-294.
37. Mechanick JI. Practical aspects of nutritional support for wound-healing patients. Am J Surg 2004;188(1A suppl):52-56.
38. Kagansky N, Berner Y, Koren-Morag N, et al. Poor nutritional habits are predictors of poor outcome in very old hospitalized patients. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:784-791, 913-914.
39. Schols JM, de Jager-v d Ende MA. Nutritional intervention in pressure ulcer guidelines: An inventory. Nutrition 2004;20:548-553.
40. Thomas DR. Improving outcome of pressure ulcers with nutritional interventions: A review of the evidence. Nutrition 2001;17:121-125.
41. Finucane TE. Malnutrition, tube feeding, and pressure sores: Data are incomplete. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995;43:447-451.
42. Bourdel-Marchasson I, Barateau M, Rondeau V, et al. A multi-center trial of the effects of oral nutritional supplementation in critically ill older inpatients. GAGE Group. Groupe Aquitain Geriatrique d’Evaluation. Nutrition 2000;16:1-5.
43. Langer G, Schloemer G, Knerr A, et al. Nutritional interventions for preventing and treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(4):CD003216.
44. Taylor TV, Rimmer S, Day B, et al. Ascorbic acid supplementation in the treatment of pressure-sores. Lancet 1974;2:544-546.
45. ter Riet G, Kessels AG, Knipschild PG. Randomized clinical trial of ascorbic acid in the treatment of pressure ulcers. J Clin Epidemiol1995;48:1453-1460.
46. Tubek S. Zinc supplementation or regulation of its homeostasis: Advantages and threats. Biol Trace Elem Res 2007;119:1-9.
47. Wood RJ. Assessment of marginal zinc status in humans. J Nutr 2000;130(5S suppl):1350S-1354S.
48. Norris JR, Reynolds RE. The effect of oral zinc sulfate therapy on decubitus ulcers. J Am Geriatr Soc 1971;19:793-797.
49. Frias Soriano L, Lage Vázquez MA, Maristany CP, et al. The effectiveness of oral nutritional supplementation in the healing of pressure ulcers. J Wound Care 2004;13:319-322.
50. Vilter RW. Nutritional aspects of ascorbic acid: Uses and abuses. West J Med 1980;133:485-492.
51. Houston S, Haggard J, Williford J Jr, et al. Adverse effects of large-dose zinc supplementation in an institutionalized older population with pressure ulcers. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:1130-1132.
52. Pressure Ulcers in Adults: Prediction and Prevention. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research; 1992.
53. Pressure Ulcers in the Long-Term Care Setting. Columbia, MD: American Medical Directors Association; 2008.
54. Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines. Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment following spinal cord injury: A clinical practice guideline for healthcare professionals. J Spinal Cord Med 2001;24(suppl 1):S40-S101.