• LOGIN
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • FREE E-Newsletter/Product Bulletins

Annals of Long Term Care

  • Follow us on

Search

  • Home
  • ARCHIVES
    • Issues
    • Supplements/Webcasts
  • About Us
    • Mission Statement
    • Editorial Description
    • Editorial Board
    • Publishing Staff
    • Our Partners
    • AGS Affiliations
    • Reprints/Permissions
  • SUBMIT
    • Author Guidelines
    • Copyright Transfer Form
    • Author Disclosure Form
    • Submit Now
  • CONTACT
  • ADVERTISING
    • Print Rate Card
    • Online Rate Card
    • Classified Rate Card
    • Sales Contacts
  • Supplements/Special Projects
  • Journal News
  • WEBCASTS
    • Facing Postherpetic Neuralgia in LTC
    • Treatment for Postherpetic Neuralgia Pain
    • Case Study—LTC Patient Suffering from PHN

Medical Malpractice and Long-Term Care; Part II: Risk Management

  • Fri, 9/5/08 - 4:54pm
  • 1 Comments
  • 3442 reads
Author(s): 

Patrick P. Coll, MD

This is part II of a two-part article. Part I addressed litigation and appeared in the April issue of the Journal.

Introduction
There has been a significant increase in medical malpractice lawsuits in long-term care (LTC).1 Therefore, the facilities and the healthcare providers who work in them need to be aware of several important risk management strategies that can reduce their likelihood of being sued for medical malpractice. Good medical practice and medical malpractice risk reduction are congruent activities.2 There are, however, several areas of practice where a limited amount of additional attention can substantially reduce the risk of being sued.

Communication
Many aggrieved patients and family members cite poor communication with their healthcare provider as a primary reason they decide to sue. Increasing time constraints may cause some providers to reduce the amount of time they spend explaining an illness, change in condition, or results of a test with their patient or patient’s guardian. Many residents in LTC have medical conditions that are chronic and will almost certainly get worse. Inadequate explanation of the condition may lead to unrealistic expectations of recovery. Many patients in LTC have dementia and are unable to understand the nature of their illness and necessary treatments.

Initial findings and significant changes in condition should be discussed with the patient’s guardian. This is particularly important if a current plan of care is not producing the desired results. Take the time to communicate with the patient or call the patient’s guardian at the time of admission and when there is a significant change in condition or an inadequate response to current treatments. Set some common goals, and if recovery is not anticipated, be sure to address this situation. Conflict may exist between family members regarding the appropriate plan of care. It is good practice to establish one family member as the primary contact person. Occasionally, it may be necessary to sit down with several family members to address particularly difficult issues and work out differences of opinion.

Adequate communication between providers is also important for good patient care and risk management. Notification of significant events should be encouraged. Significant changes and the need to follow up on ordered tests should be conveyed to covering providers. Good communication reduces malpractice cases.3

Documentation
Detailed documentation of care delivered and the plan of care is a key component of risk management. It is disconcerting to see the paucity of detail and the illegibility of most physicians’ notes when reviewing medical records pertaining to a malpractice case. Once again, perceived time constraints may result in a care provider inadequately documenting care. Good medical documentation is important to justify the providers’ professional charges, provide information regarding the case for other providers, and help defend a medical malpractice case should one occur. Illegible, scant, and incoherent notes give the appearance of irresponsibility to the care delivered.

Initial documentation of a new admission needs to be thorough. Indicate in the documentation the sources from which you gathered information and whom you talked to. State the plan of care. Document areas of concern, and if recovery is unlikely and further deterioration is anticipated, be sure to document this and the fact that it has been discussed with the patient or guardian.

The facility will in most circumstances document the provider’s notification of a significant change in condition. The provider should also document this notification.

References: 

References

1. Stevenson DG, Studdert DM. The rise of nursing home litigation: Findings from a national survey of attorneys. Health Aff (Millwood) 2003;22(2):219-229.
2. Howe JS. How to integrate risk management and quality assurance. J Long Term Care Adm 1994;22(1):27-29.
3. Scott-Cawiezell J, Vogelsmeier A, McKenney R, et al. Moving from a culture of blame to a culture of safety in the nursing home setting. Nurs Forum 2006;41(3):133-140.
4. Brown G. Wound documentation: Managing risk. Adv Skin Wound Care 2006;19(3):155-167.
5. Bennett RG, O’Sullivan J, DeVito EM, Remsburg R. The increasing medical malpractice risk related to pressure sore in the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48(1):73-81.
6. Ganz DA, Bao Y, Shekelle PG, Rubenstein LZ. Will my patient fall? JAMA 2007;297(1):77-86.
7. Hays NP, Roberts SB. The anorexia of aging in humans. Physiol Behav 2006;88(3):257-266.
8. Chan Carusone SB, Walter SD, Brazil K, Loeb MB. Pneumonia and lower respiratory infections in nursing home residents: Predictors of hospitalization and mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55(3):414-419.
9. Van Walraven C, Rokosh E. What is necessary for high-quality discharge summaries? Am J Med Qual 1999;14(4):160-169.
10. Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, et al. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: Implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA 2007;297(8):831-841.

image description image description
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
  • last »



Christina Whiteleysays: August 19.2011 at 23:20 pm

An amazing article, very well written. I am prepping for the Risk Management Certification, and this article is through, clear and concise. A pleasure to read!

Reply to this comment »

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

LATEST NEWS

  • FDA Finally Approves Once-Weekly Type 2 Diabetes Treatment
    [Amylin] 1-31-12
  • FDA approves Voraxaze to treat patients with toxic methotrexate levels
    [FDA] 1-17-12
  • FDA approves first generic version of cholesterol-lowering drug Lipitor
    [FDA] 11-30-11
  • AHRQ Awards $34 Million To Expand Fight Against Healthcare-Associated Infections
    [AHRQ] 11-17-11
more »

Poll

Are nutritional supplements underutilized in long-term care?:

Classified/Recruitment Opportunities

  • Advertise Your Job Here
more »

ALTC Blogs

How to Create Collegiality in a Difference of Opinion: Part 1

Neil Baum MD
2/3/12 | 0 Comments | 12 reads

Dutasteride vs Low Grade Prostate Cancer

Alvin B Lin MD FAAFP
1/31/12 | 0 Comments | 37 reads

Finding “Dr. Right” For Your Practice

Neil Baum MD
1/30/12 | 0 Comments | 40 reads
more »
banner banner banner banner banner
HMP Communications © 2012 HMP Communications
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Other Publications
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

HMP Communications LLC (HMP) is the authoritative source for comprehensive information and education servicing healthcare professionals. HMP’s products include peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed medical journals, national tradeshows and conferences, online programs and customized clinical programs. HMP is a wholly owned subsidiary of HMP Communications Holdings LLC. © 2012 HMP Communications