Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)

Author(s): 

Meredith Wallace, PhD, APRN, BC, and Mary Shelkey PhD, ARNP

Issue Number 2, Revised 2007

Series Editor: Marie Boltz, MSN, APRN, BC, GNP
Managing Editor: Sherry A. Greenberg, MSN, APRN, BC, GNP
NYU College of Nursing

WHY: Normal aging changes and health problems frequently show themselves as declines in the functional status of older adults. Decline may place the older adult on a spiral of iatrogenesis leading to further health problems. One of the best ways to evaluate the health status of older adults is through functional assessment which provides objective data that may indicate future decline or improvement in health status, allowing the nurse to intervene appropriately.

BEST TOOL: The Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, commonly referred to as the Katz ADL, is the most appropriate instrument to assess functional status as a measurement of the client’s ability to perform activities of daily living independently. Clinicians typically use the tool to detect problems in performing activities of daily living and to plan care accordingly. The Index ranks adequacy of performance in the six functions of bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, and feeding. Clients are scored yes/no for independence in each of the six functions. A score of 6 indicates full function, 4 indicates moderate impairment, and 2 or less indicates severe functional impairment.

TARGET POPULATION: The instrument is most effectively used among older adults in a variety of care settings, when baseline measurements, taken when the client is well, are compared to periodic or subsequent measures.

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY: In the thirtyfive years since the instrument has been developed, it has been modified and simplified and different approaches to scoring have been used. However, it has consistently demonstrated its utility in evaluating functional status in the elderly population. Although no formal reliability and validity reports could be found in the literature, the tool is used extensively as a flag signaling functional capabilities of older adults in clinical and home environments.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: The Katz ADL Index assesses basic activities of daily living. It does not assess more advanced activities of daily living. Katz developed another scale for instrumental activities of daily living such as heavy housework, shopping, managing finances and telephoning. Although the Katz ADL Index is sensitive to changes in declining health status, it is limited in its ability to measure small increments of change seen in the rehabilitation of older adults. A full comprehensive geriatric assessment should follow when appropriate. The Katz ADL Index is very useful in creating a common language about patient function for all practitioners involved in overall care planning and discharge planning.

MORE ON THE TOPIC:
Best practice information on care of older adults: http://www.GeroNurseOnline.org.

Graf, C. (2006). Functional decline in hospitalized older adults. AJN, 106(1), 58-67.

Katz, S., Down, T.D., Cash, H.R., & Grotz, R.C. (1970) Progress in the development of the index of ADL. The Gerontologist, 10(1), 20-30.

Katz, S. (1983). Assessing selfmaintenance: Activities of daily living, mobility and instrumental activities of daily living. JAGS, 31(12), 721-726.

Kresevic, D.M., & Mezey, M. (2003). Assessment of function. In M. Mezey, T. Fulmer, I. Abraham (Eds.), D. Zwicker (Managing Ed.), Geriatric nursing protocols for best practice (2nd ed., pp 3146). NY: Springer Publishing Co., Inc.

Mick, D.J., & Ackerman, M.H. (2004, Sept). Critical care nursing for older adults: Pathophysiological and functional considerations. Nursing Clinics of North America, 39(3), 47393.

Permission is hereby granted to reproduce, post, download, and/or distribute, this material in its entirety only for notforprofit educational purposes only, provided that The Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing, College of Nursing, New York University is cited as the source. This material may be downloaded and/or distributed in electronic format, including PDA format. Available on the internet at www.hartfordign.org and/or www.GeroNurseOnline.org. Email notification of usage to: hartford.ign@nyu.edu.

Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living

ACTIVITIES
Points (1 OR 0)

INDEPENDENCE: (1 Point)
NO supervision, direction or personal assistance

DEPENDENCE: (0 Points)
WITH supervision, direction, personal assistance or total care

BATHING
(1 Point) Bathes self completely or needs help in bathing only a single part of the body such as the back, genital area or disabled extremity.

(0 Points) Needs help with bathing more than one part of the body, getting in or out of the tub or shower. Requires total bathing.

POINTS:____________

DRESSING
(1 Point) Gets clothes from closets and drawers and puts on clothes and outer garments complete with fasteners. May have help tying shoes.

(0 Points) Needs help with dressing self or needs to be completely dressed.

POINTS:____________

TOILETING
(1 Point) Goes to toilet, gets on and off, arranges clothes, cleans genital area without help.

(0 POINTS) Needs help transferring to the toilet, cleaning self or uses bedpan or commode.

POINTS:____________

TRANSFERRING
(1 Point) Moves in and out of bed or chair unassisted. Mechanical transferring aides are acceptable.

(0 Points) Needs help in moving from bed to chair or requires a complete transfer.

POINTS:___________

CONTINENCE
(1 Point) Exercises complete self control over urination and defecation.

(0 Points) Is partially or totally incontinent of bowel or bladder.

POINTS:___________

FEEDING
(1 Point) Gets food from plate into mouth without help. Preparation of food may be done by another person.

(0 Points) Needs partial or total help with feeding or requires parenteral feeding.

POINTS:___________

TOTAL POINTS = ___________6 = High (patient independent) 0 = Low (patient very dependent)

Slightly adapted from Katz, S., Down, T.D., Cash, H.R., & Grotz, R.C. (1970) Progress in the development of the index of ADL. The Gerontologist, 10(1), 2030. Copyright © The Gerontological Society of America. Reproduced [Adapted] by permission of the publisher.

A series provided by The Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing
E-mail: hartford.ign@nyu.edu
Hartford Institute website: www.hartfordign.org
Geronurseonline website: www.GeroNurseOnline.org

Comments

While the Katz Index is a solid tool for measuring an elderly persons functionality, we need to question why such a tool is necessary. My experience tells me that the small changes in health decline are just as important to notice as the large ones. Patients in long term care are very rarely introduced to new caretakers without the supervision of others who know their level of disability and can adequately bring others up to speed. This kind of hands on passing of the torch is, to me, much more effective than using forms and measurments. This index seems to be explicitly for paperwork and record keeping. It doesn't seem to have a genuine place in the actual care of patients. <a href="http://www.hccmis.com/short-term-medical-insurance/">temporary health insurance</a>

This is a great tool for evaluating not only the client's level of independence but the type of in-home care required to allow them to continue living at home. Many times family members are not available to provide or even be aware of the client's capabilities. Many seniors often do no realize how they have 'adapted' to their declining ability to perform certain adl's or iadl's until they are unable to complete them at all independently. 

Add new comment