Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)
- Fri, 9/5/08 - 5:54pm
- 1 Comments
- 55608 reads
Meredith Wallace, PhD, APRN, BC, and Mary Shelkey PhD, ARNP
Issue Number 2, Revised 2007
Series Editor: Marie Boltz, MSN, APRN, BC, GNP
Managing Editor: Sherry A. Greenberg, MSN, APRN, BC, GNP
NYU College of Nursing
WHY: Normal aging changes and health problems frequently show themselves as declines in the functional status of older adults. Decline may place the older adult on a spiral of iatrogenesis leading to further health problems. One of the best ways to evaluate the health status of older adults is through functional assessment which provides objective data that may indicate future decline or improvement in health status, allowing the nurse to intervene appropriately.
BEST TOOL: The Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, commonly referred to as the Katz ADL, is the most appropriate instrument to assess functional status as a measurement of the client’s ability to perform activities of daily living independently. Clinicians typically use the tool to detect problems in performing activities of daily living and to plan care accordingly. The Index ranks adequacy of performance in the six functions of bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, and feeding. Clients are scored yes/no for independence in each of the six functions. A score of 6 indicates full function, 4 indicates moderate impairment, and 2 or less indicates severe functional impairment.
TARGET POPULATION: The instrument is most effectively used among older adults in a variety of care settings, when baseline measurements, taken when the client is well, are compared to periodic or subsequent measures.
VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY: In the thirtyfive years since the instrument has been developed, it has been modified and simplified and different approaches to scoring have been used. However, it has consistently demonstrated its utility in evaluating functional status in the elderly population. Although no formal reliability and validity reports could be found in the literature, the tool is used extensively as a flag signaling functional capabilities of older adults in clinical and home environments.
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: The Katz ADL Index assesses basic activities of daily living. It does not assess more advanced activities of daily living. Katz developed another scale for instrumental activities of daily living such as heavy housework, shopping, managing finances and telephoning. Although the Katz ADL Index is sensitive to changes in declining health status, it is limited in its ability to measure small increments of change seen in the rehabilitation of older adults. A full comprehensive geriatric assessment should follow when appropriate. The Katz ADL Index is very useful in creating a common language about patient function for all practitioners involved in overall care planning and discharge planning.
MORE ON THE TOPIC:
Best practice information on care of older adults: http://www.GeroNurseOnline.org.
Graf, C. (2006). Functional decline in hospitalized older adults. AJN, 106(1), 58-67.
Katz, S., Down, T.D., Cash, H.R., & Grotz, R.C. (1970) Progress in the development of the index of ADL. The Gerontologist, 10(1), 20-30.
Katz, S. (1983). Assessing selfmaintenance: Activities of daily living, mobility and instrumental activities of daily living. JAGS, 31(12), 721-726.
Kresevic, D.M., & Mezey, M. (2003). Assessment of function. In M. Mezey, T. Fulmer, I. Abraham (Eds.), D. Zwicker (Managing Ed.), Geriatric nursing protocols for best practice (2nd ed., pp 3146). NY: Springer Publishing Co., Inc.
Mick, D.J., & Ackerman, M.H. (2004, Sept). Critical care nursing for older adults: Pathophysiological and functional considerations. Nursing Clinics of North America, 39(3), 47393.










While the Katz Index is a solid tool for measuring an elderly persons functionality, we need to question why such a tool is necessary. My experience tells me that the small changes in health decline are just as important to notice as the large ones. Patients in long term care are very rarely introduced to new caretakers without the supervision of others who know their level of disability and can adequately bring others up to speed. This kind of hands on passing of the torch is, to me, much more effective than using forms and measurments. This index seems to be explicitly for paperwork and record keeping. It doesn't seem to have a genuine place in the actual care of patients. <a href="http://www.hccmis.com/short-term-medical-insurance/">temporary health insurance</a>
Reply to this comment »Post new comment